← Back To All Posts
Date:
September 25, 2020

Exploring The Mulan Controversy

Disney’s new film “Mulan” has become a worldwide sensation, but not for the reasons one might think. The live-action film has generated an unusual amount of political debate. “Mulan,” directed by  Niki Caro,  is Disney’s remake of its 1998 animated film, based on the classic Chinese ballad. Due to the pandemic, the studio released the film on its streaming service Disney+, with plans to screen the film theatrically in countries where cinemas are open.

After keeping quiet calls to boycott the film dominated social media, top Disney brass admitted that a string of controversies created issues for the studio. During a virtual conference , chief financial officer Christine McCarthy discussed the challenges faced by Disney before and after the release of the film.

How does an innocent remake of an animated classic explode into a social media nightmare for a studio specializing in family fare? In this case, several things went wrong for Disney.

The Hong Kong Protests Controversy

In February 2019, China introduced a contentious extradition bill which allowed criminals to be transferred freely between Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macau and mainland China. Critics feared that the bill would be exploited to allow Hong Kong to send criminal suspects to mainland China. The people of Hong Kong saw it as one more attempt by the Chinese Communist Party to encroach on its freedom. Citizens protested strongly and the anti-extradition bill movement evolved into a pro-democracy movement . In retaliation, the Hong Kong Police used aggressive force to discourage protesters which increased the divide between the Hong Kong police and citizens.

Amid the protests, notable Chinese figures such as Jackie Chan and Liu Yifei , among others, voiced their support for both the Chinese government and the Hong Kong police. Liu, a naturalized American citizen, is the lead character who plays Mulan. She shared a meme which was construed as support for the Hong Kong police. It did not take long for the post to circulate and spark backlash from pro-democracy supporters. With that, the call began for a boycott of “Mulan” and #BoycottMulan started to trend in several countries. The second problem for “Mulan” is its filming location.

The Uighur Dispute

It appears parts of “Mulan” were filmed in Xinjiang , China, two years ago. Viewers noticed this in the credits when Disney thanked eight government bodies in Xinjiang, a western province in China where around  2 million Uighur Muslims  have been allegedly forced into concentration camps by the Chinese government. The film credits specifically praise the police security bureau in  Turpan , a city in eastern Xinjiang with a large Uighur population. Experts say that bureau is  tasked with running some of the internment camps and was  blacklisted  last year by the U.S. Commerce Department.

The outcry over the filming location now includes U.S. lawmakers . Politicians from both parties have already  criticized China  over a range of issues in the run-up to the November 2020 elections. American politicians fired off vehement missives against Disney. Representative Mike Gallagher, Republican of Wisconsin,  tweeted  that “while the CCP is committing crimes against humanity in Xinjiang,  @Disney  thanked four of the propaganda departments that are lying to the world about these crimes. It also thanked the Turpan Public Security Bureau, which is on the entity list for its role in these atrocities.”

Reactions Against Direct to Streaming Release

Even in Europe, the strife doggedly follows “Mulan.” The news that Disney  would bypass cinemas by premiering “ Mulan ”  directly onto Disney+  provoked a furious backlash from international exhibitors who felt the studio was declining support in times of need. In France, Gerard Lemoine, a frustrated theater owner, displayed his anger with Disney’s decision in an extreme fashion. Lemoine, who owns the French indie venue Cinepal in Palaiseau, posted a video of him destroying “Mulan” pop-up art via Twitter. Lemoine’s video has over 328K views and the post received a substantial amount of replies.

Cultural Dissonance

Though Disney did its best to create a film that that would appeal to China, many Chinese viewers rejected the film as offensively inauthentic. “The Americans invited all the famous Chinese actors they could think of and piled together all the Chinese elements that they could find to create this car crash,” reads one of the most popular reviews . “It’s full of Western stereotypes and conjectures about China, and particularly ancient China.”

Many viewers in China felt that Disney’s new heroine starts out from childhood already equipped with superhero-like abilities, thanks to her extraordinary reserves of “qi.” While Chinese viewers are familiar with the concept of “qi,” they are puzzled by Disney’s take on the vital energy traditionally considered to underlie the practice of Chinese medicine and martial arts, asking: “What exactly is ‘qi’ here?”- hinting that concepts were applied without any real understanding of the cultural roots.

“Mulan,” much like “ Crazy Rich Asians ” was initially celebrated in the West for being a landmark for Asian American representation, due to its all-Asian cast . Yet many of the elements included to boost its cultural resonance have not succeeded in appealing to its target mainland audience.

One viewer wrote that the script’s constant repetition of the terms “loyal, brave and true” felt like “ a Google Translate take on Chinese .” In one scene, Mulan throws away all her protective armor in the middle of a battle. To the ethnic audience, the choice is obviously nonsensical, but it is also highly unfilial, since the garb is a treasured heirloom from her father.

Chinese audience members are familiar with the original ballad in its classical Chinese. They intimately know final lines — an allegory for gender equality that male and female rabbits look identical when running side by side. Numerous respondents laughed at how the film presents this by having the young heroine spot two rabbits in a field and commenting on how she could not determine their gender, calling the moment one of “forced East-West fusion.”

Once again, “Mulan” clearly demonstrates Hollywood’s lack of detail and accuracy in its attempt to bridge the cultural gap between the East and the West.

Disney’s chief financial officer Christine McCarthy said, in her statement addressing the criticism, “Let me just put something into context. The real facts are that “Mulan” was primarily shot — almost entirely — in New Zealand.” She continued, “In an effort to accurately depict some of the unique landscape and geography of the country of China for this period drama, we filmed scenery in 20 different locations in China.” McCarthy then explained, “It’s common knowledge that to film in China, you have to be granted permission. That permission comes from the central government. So, in our credits, it recognized both China and locations in New Zealand. I would just leave it at that, but it has generated a lot of issues for us.”

Authorities in China recently ordered media outlets not to cover “Mulan’s” release in China. While no official reason is given, reports conclude the international backlash relating to Xinjiang is likely the major cause.

Related Insights

Spherex Classification Tool Now Approved for Home Entertainment Content in Australia

The Albanese Government has updated the Spherex Classification Tool approval to include ratings for theatrical releases, home entertainment, and streaming content in Australia. Spherex was previously approved to classify online films.

The update underscores the Australian Classification Board’s confidence in Spherex as a tool to help Australian viewers make informed choices about the content they consume. This means Australians can now access a range of new films sooner than they might across all formats and windows.

Spherex has a longstanding relationship with the Australian Classification Board. Since 2020, Spherex has collaborated closely with the Australian Government to ensure its technology reliably generates classification decisions that meet Australian standards and viewers' expectations.

As the world’s only commercial provider of local age ratings, Spherex has successfully produced classification decisions for high volumes of online content in over 100 countries. Since 2018, Spherex has issued over one million age ratings for digital content, including films, TV shows, and trailers, distributed by its clients worldwide.

Spherex customers, including Umbrella Entertainment, Madman Entertainment, and Sugoi Co., rely on its AI-based platform to obtain local age ratings in Australia and significantly improve efficiency, cost reduction, and market reach.

Discover how Spherex's cutting-edge AI-based platform can streamline your content classification process and enhance your market reach while reducing costs.

Visit spherex.com today and see how we can support your content distribution needs.

Read Now

nScreenNoise - Interview Spherex: Avoiding the cultural dead zone

One of the conundrums of streaming is that although a service can deliver content globally, it is not guaranteed to be acceptable in a particular local market. Netflix found this out when it announced global availability in 2016 at CES and was quickly banned in markets like Indonesia, where some of the content was deemed too violent or sexual. In 2016, without boots on the ground in a local market, it wasn’t easy to assess whether a show or movie would be culturally acceptable.

Today, global media companies are acutely aware of the importance of their content’s cultural fit. Moreover, they have a company like Spherex to help them prepare their content to ensure it fits with any country of interest. I interviewed Teresa Phillips, the Co-Founder and CEO of Spherex, at the recent OTT.X Summit in Los Angeles. She explained how the company is leveraging AI and its massive cultural profiling database to help companies prepare content for target markets. She also explained how, in the near future, AI would aid the company in measuring a movie or show’s cultural distance from a regional market and help it avoid falling into the failure zone between cultural fit and novelty interest.

Listen to the full interview here.

Read Now

Spherex Featured in the DPP's IBC 2024: Demand versus Supply Report

Spherex was featured in the DPP’s IBC 2024: Demand versus Supply Report, a comprehensive look at how the M&E industry is meeting key customer demands. The report focuses on the topics of empowering creators, understanding audiences, engaging users, and innovating the newsroom. It also highlights many of the technical innovations seen at the recent IBC Show.

An article by Spherex’s CEO Teresa Phillips titled "Navigating Cultural Resonance in Global Media: The Art and Science of Culture Mixing" was featured in the report, exploring how Spherex is pioneering the future of culturally informed content.

Teresa shares how cultural mixing has become a critical strategy for creating content that appeals to diverse audiences in today's global media landscape. This phenomenon involves blending elements from different cultures to craft films and television shows that resonate globally while adhering to local regulations.

However, the process of culture mixing is fraught with risks. Superficial or stereotypical representations can lead to accusations of cultural appropriation or insensitivity, alienating audiences and damaging a company's reputation. For example, imposing Western concepts on Eastern content without proper context can feel inauthentic and jarring to local viewers. These missteps highlight the need for a nuanced understanding of cultural elements to ensure that content is respectful and engaging.

To address these challenges, M&E companies are increasingly turning to data-driven solutions. Platforms like SpherexAI utilize artificial intelligence to analyze visual, audio, and textual elements, providing insights into how well content aligns with cultural and regulatory standards across over 200 countries and territories. This approach helps media companies understand the "cultural distance" between a title's origin and its target market, enabling them to make informed decisions about global distribution.

By leveraging these advanced tools, M&E companies can go beyond traditional content localization. They can create media that actively engages and resonates with diverse audiences. As the industry continues to evolve, those companies that embrace culturally informed, data-driven approaches will be better positioned to succeed, fostering cross-cultural understanding and trust while delivering globally appealing content.

Download the report here.

Read Now