Netflix: Back 2 Censoring the Future

Flying DeLoreans, stolen plutonium, and pornographic magazines might seem like classic tropes from an episode of the adult animated science fiction sitcom , "Rick and Morty." But those images are from the 1985 film, "Back to the Future." The 1980s was an interesting time, particularly for movie goers. Are you hungry? You can have bowls of monkey brains for lunch in "Indiana Jones And the Temple of Doom." Do you enjoy animated musicals? Check out Jessica Rabbit's sensual performance in "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?" Are you looking for love? I hear ghosts are giving oral sex in "Ghostbusters." By today's age ratings standards, it's shocking these films were featured in theaters with a PG rating. Back then, audiences had a much different perspective on what they considered lewd and offensive.

Younger generations are getting a 'taste' of that perspective as content streaming platforms present older programming. Consider Millennials watching "Tropic Thunder" and, for the first time, witnessing blackface. Robert Downey Jr. plays Kirk Lazarus: a white actor, playing an Australian actor, playing a black man. They might find it difficult to know what to think: is it a brilliant satirical take on Hollywood hubris or extremely insensitive and offensive? "Tropic Thunder" cannot be broadcast on TV without heavy censorship. Enter Netflix- it's a no-brainer for it to present films and programs from years' past. However, when Netflix acquired the licensing rights for the "Back to the Future" Trilogy, it caught flak from consumers who spotted a revision to the cult classic's second installment.

Omitting or including additional content after a theatrical release is common practice for most studios. Consider 1995's gangster classic "Casino" with 422 f-bombsand several other contentious scenes not appropriate for television airplay. When audiences watch "Casino" on TV, the experience is more comical than an episode of "Golden Girls." It just doesn't translate well. Disney rereleased 2018's "Deadpool 2" back in theaters as "Once Upon a Deadpool" with a PG-13 rating and featuring 20 minutes of completely new footage, though it is a censored version. Unrated versions or director's cuts can be released alongside the theatrical version to appease audiences who crave racy content. Similarly, Netflix gives its subscribers the option to see the 2015 theatrical release, "The Hateful Eight" orthe extended, four-part mini-series version.

"Back to the Future 2" fans voiced concerns over social media about an omitted scene. Marty McFly sneaks into Mr. Strickland's office to acquire Biff Tannen's confiscated Sports Almanac magazine from the future. After locating the magazine, the scene cuts to Marty rifling through the pages, only to realize the Sports Almanac had been swapped with Biff's smut magazine titled "Oh L√° L√°." Netflix released a cut of the film which omitted footage showing the cover of the magazine but left in the other pages of women exposing themselves.

Jason Ingolfsland's article claims "Back to the Future 2" was edited by Netflix and released for the U.S. on its streaming platform. More recently, Philip Palermo states that Netflix swapped out a censored version of the film after fans and screenwriter Bob Gale noticed the change. Gale expressed his discontent to The Hollywood Reporter asserting that the version available on Netflix was "a foreign version which neither director Robert Zemeckis nor I even knew existed, for some country that had a problem with the "Oh L√° L√°" magazine cover." Gale insisted he asked Universal Pictures to destroy that version of the film but doesn't blame Netflix. He continues "the issue stems from the version Universal supplied to Netflix, rather than the streaming company actively trying to alter the film."

In fact, Netflix doesn't edit films it receives from studios, and only streams content made available to them; they're essentially "blameless." Gale suggests fans focus frustration at Universal Studios. Thankfully, "Back to the Future" fans can rejoice as Netflix added the unaltered original version of the film back onto its platform. Though Netflix has not released an official statement or commented on the matter. In the future, Biff won't need to hide the pages of his Oh L√° L√° magazine from Mr. Strickland, he'll just swipe right on Tinder.

Related Insights

Spherex Classification Tool Now Approved for Home Entertainment Content in Australia

Spherex

Regulation

Classification

The Albanese Government has updated the Spherex Classification Tool approval to include ratings for theatrical releases, home entertainment, and streaming content in Australia. Spherex was previously approved to classify online films.

The update underscores the Australian Classification Board’s confidence in Spherex as a tool to help Australian viewers make informed choices about the content they consume. This means Australians can now access a range of new films sooner than they might across all formats and windows.

Spherex has a longstanding relationship with the Australian Classification Board. Since 2020, Spherex has collaborated closely with the Australian Government to ensure its technology reliably generates classification decisions that meet Australian standards and viewers' expectations.

As the world’s only commercial provider of local age ratings, Spherex has successfully produced classification decisions for high volumes of online content in over 100 countries. Since 2018, Spherex has issued over one million age ratings for digital content, including films, TV shows, and trailers, distributed by its clients worldwide.

Spherex customers, including Umbrella Entertainment, Madman Entertainment, and Sugoi Co., rely on its AI-based platform to obtain local age ratings in Australia and significantly improve efficiency, cost reduction, and market reach.

Discover how Spherex's cutting-edge AI-based platform can streamline your content classification process and enhance your market reach while reducing costs.

Visit spherex.com today and see how we can support your content distribution needs.

Read Now

nScreenNoise - Interview Spherex: Avoiding the cultural dead zone

Spherex

Culture

One of the conundrums of streaming is that although a service can deliver content globally, it is not guaranteed to be acceptable in a particular local market. Netflix found this out when it announced global availability in 2016 at CES and was quickly banned in markets like Indonesia, where some of the content was deemed too violent or sexual. In 2016, without boots on the ground in a local market, it wasn’t easy to assess whether a show or movie would be culturally acceptable.

Today, global media companies are acutely aware of the importance of their content’s cultural fit. Moreover, they have a company like Spherex to help them prepare their content to ensure it fits with any country of interest. I interviewed Teresa Phillips, the Co-Founder and CEO of Spherex, at the recent OTT.X Summit in Los Angeles. She explained how the company is leveraging AI and its massive cultural profiling database to help companies prepare content for target markets. She also explained how, in the near future, AI would aid the company in measuring a movie or show’s cultural distance from a regional market and help it avoid falling into the failure zone between cultural fit and novelty interest.

Listen to the full interview here.

Read Now

Spherex Featured in the DPP's IBC 2024: Demand versus Supply Report

Spherex

Industry

Spherex was featured in the DPP’s IBC 2024: Demand versus Supply Report, a comprehensive look at how the M&E industry is meeting key customer demands. The report focuses on the topics of empowering creators, understanding audiences, engaging users, and innovating the newsroom. It also highlights many of the technical innovations seen at the recent IBC Show.

An article by Spherex’s CEO Teresa Phillips titled "Navigating Cultural Resonance in Global Media: The Art and Science of Culture Mixing" was featured in the report, exploring how Spherex is pioneering the future of culturally informed content.

Teresa shares how cultural mixing has become a critical strategy for creating content that appeals to diverse audiences in today's global media landscape. This phenomenon involves blending elements from different cultures to craft films and television shows that resonate globally while adhering to local regulations.

However, the process of culture mixing is fraught with risks. Superficial or stereotypical representations can lead to accusations of cultural appropriation or insensitivity, alienating audiences and damaging a company's reputation. For example, imposing Western concepts on Eastern content without proper context can feel inauthentic and jarring to local viewers. These missteps highlight the need for a nuanced understanding of cultural elements to ensure that content is respectful and engaging.

To address these challenges, M&E companies are increasingly turning to data-driven solutions. Platforms like SpherexAI utilize artificial intelligence to analyze visual, audio, and textual elements, providing insights into how well content aligns with cultural and regulatory standards across over 200 countries and territories. This approach helps media companies understand the "cultural distance" between a title's origin and its target market, enabling them to make informed decisions about global distribution.

By leveraging these advanced tools, M&E companies can go beyond traditional content localization. They can create media that actively engages and resonates with diverse audiences. As the industry continues to evolve, those companies that embrace culturally informed, data-driven approaches will be better positioned to succeed, fostering cross-cultural understanding and trust while delivering globally appealing content.

Download the report here.

Read Now