← Back To All Posts
Date:
November 15, 2021

Understanding the TV Ratings Chart

Every time we turn on our television, and before any program begins, a box appears on our screens that contain the show's age rating. Also known as parental guidelines, this rating may not matter much to kids, but it informs parents that what they watch may or may not be suitable for everyone.

In the U.S., there are currently seven (7) television ratings displayed on-screen. They are:

Comparing TV age ratings to movie ratings, three things stand out. First, there is a general overlap between the primary TV and movie ratings. This is done primarily to avoid confusion. Second, there are more types of TV programs being developed for young children than there are films, so the industry created three additional ratings to better inform parents of content within those shows they may choose to restrict from their children's viewing. Thirdly and conversely, there is no TV rating for purely adult content, because such content is not specifically developed or available on TV. Such content is available, but only from age-restricted subscription services or pay-per-view.

When notices appear on-screen can vary. If the show is longer than one hour, then the rating icon--if it appears at all--will reappear at the bottom or top of the hour. Some channels display the rating icon after each commercial break, but not all do.

But what about streaming platforms?

All content needs to be rated no matter its platform. Streaming platforms have generally adopted both TV and movie ratings methodologies in the US. The difference is streaming services are more willing to label content "unrated" if no "official" rating has been obtained or if the producer or distributor of the content has not "self-rated" it. TV content such as news, sports, religious, paid advertising and home shopping programs are not required to have ratings, and therefore do not display one.

Age ratings do have an impact on audience. If parents don't see an episodic or film rating at-a-glance, then they won't know if they should let their kids watch it. In film, a movie with an "R" rating will have fewer viewers than a "PG-13 rated film." Smaller audiences mean fewer ticket sales, which mean less revenue. If that happens in TV, lower-rated shows lose out on additional views, which means lower share ratings and the show may not get renewed or ever be rebroadcast. On streaming platforms, an "Unrated" show may be ignored by search algorithms, again missing out on any ability to find an audience.

Streamers offer additional tools parents can use to define and limit the types of content their children can watch. Disney+, Netflix, Hulu, Prime Video and others offer parental controls and even kid's profiles for just this purpose and some make sure the kids stay safe. For example, Disney+ offers a "Kid-Proof" feature that prohibits them from leaving their profile without passing a test. These parental options have not yet made their way to linear TV services.

Source: soda.com

Recommendations for Improving the System

Some organizations are calling for a more uniform approach to ratings. The Catholic News reported last month (September 2021) the TV Parental Guidelines Board's (PGB) recommended guidelines for streaming services—and how they "can and should adopt age-based ratings and applicable descriptors." They suggest that, like most television shows, streaming providers should display rating when consumers scroll through their viewing options. The PGB also said that these ratings should be displayed across all viewing platforms: television and online. So, whether we're watching snippets of "Bridgerton" on YouTube or Netflix, the ratings should display the same unless heavily edited to meet a "G" rating.

Tim Winter, the president of the Parents Television Council , insisted the new guidelines would be a positive, if small, step to fixing some of the "widespread inconsistencies in how programs are rated," specifically on streaming platforms.

Other countries have already taken action to limit the amount of violent material that could frighten young children, among other things. According to the Center for Media Literacy , more productive ratings systems "pay attention to developmental age differences" between children age groups and aim to address viewers at home and in theaters.

Sweden, Spain, Norway, Germany, and Denmark all have a ratings system that considers the type and intensity of violent material shown. Based on those factors, their ratings classifications "either warn parents about violent material or restrict theater access" for younger children. Spain is also one of several countries that have developed specific classifications for televised content . Other countries include Australia, Chile, France, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Malaysia, Maldives, New Zealand, Peru, the Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Thailand, Turkey, and Venezuela. Conversely, other countries such as South Africa, the Netherlands, Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina have adapted film ratings for television. This is separate from the United States, which has independent ratings systems for television and film.

TV and movie rating systems exist as tools consumers can use to learn about the appropriateness of content for their families. Given the concern being raised by parents that with so many titles becoming available on TV and on streaming platforms, how, where and when age ratings are available is more important than ever before.

Related Insights

Spherex Classification Tool Now Approved for Home Entertainment Content in Australia

The Albanese Government has updated the Spherex Classification Tool approval to include ratings for theatrical releases, home entertainment, and streaming content in Australia. Spherex was previously approved to classify online films.

The update underscores the Australian Classification Board’s confidence in Spherex as a tool to help Australian viewers make informed choices about the content they consume. This means Australians can now access a range of new films sooner than they might across all formats and windows.

Spherex has a longstanding relationship with the Australian Classification Board. Since 2020, Spherex has collaborated closely with the Australian Government to ensure its technology reliably generates classification decisions that meet Australian standards and viewers' expectations.

As the world’s only commercial provider of local age ratings, Spherex has successfully produced classification decisions for high volumes of online content in over 100 countries. Since 2018, Spherex has issued over one million age ratings for digital content, including films, TV shows, and trailers, distributed by its clients worldwide.

Spherex customers, including Umbrella Entertainment, Madman Entertainment, and Sugoi Co., rely on its AI-based platform to obtain local age ratings in Australia and significantly improve efficiency, cost reduction, and market reach.

Discover how Spherex's cutting-edge AI-based platform can streamline your content classification process and enhance your market reach while reducing costs.

Visit spherex.com today and see how we can support your content distribution needs.

Read Now

nScreenNoise - Interview Spherex: Avoiding the cultural dead zone

One of the conundrums of streaming is that although a service can deliver content globally, it is not guaranteed to be acceptable in a particular local market. Netflix found this out when it announced global availability in 2016 at CES and was quickly banned in markets like Indonesia, where some of the content was deemed too violent or sexual. In 2016, without boots on the ground in a local market, it wasn’t easy to assess whether a show or movie would be culturally acceptable.

Today, global media companies are acutely aware of the importance of their content’s cultural fit. Moreover, they have a company like Spherex to help them prepare their content to ensure it fits with any country of interest. I interviewed Teresa Phillips, the Co-Founder and CEO of Spherex, at the recent OTT.X Summit in Los Angeles. She explained how the company is leveraging AI and its massive cultural profiling database to help companies prepare content for target markets. She also explained how, in the near future, AI would aid the company in measuring a movie or show’s cultural distance from a regional market and help it avoid falling into the failure zone between cultural fit and novelty interest.

Listen to the full interview here.

Read Now

Spherex Featured in the DPP's IBC 2024: Demand versus Supply Report

Spherex was featured in the DPP’s IBC 2024: Demand versus Supply Report, a comprehensive look at how the M&E industry is meeting key customer demands. The report focuses on the topics of empowering creators, understanding audiences, engaging users, and innovating the newsroom. It also highlights many of the technical innovations seen at the recent IBC Show.

An article by Spherex’s CEO Teresa Phillips titled "Navigating Cultural Resonance in Global Media: The Art and Science of Culture Mixing" was featured in the report, exploring how Spherex is pioneering the future of culturally informed content.

Teresa shares how cultural mixing has become a critical strategy for creating content that appeals to diverse audiences in today's global media landscape. This phenomenon involves blending elements from different cultures to craft films and television shows that resonate globally while adhering to local regulations.

However, the process of culture mixing is fraught with risks. Superficial or stereotypical representations can lead to accusations of cultural appropriation or insensitivity, alienating audiences and damaging a company's reputation. For example, imposing Western concepts on Eastern content without proper context can feel inauthentic and jarring to local viewers. These missteps highlight the need for a nuanced understanding of cultural elements to ensure that content is respectful and engaging.

To address these challenges, M&E companies are increasingly turning to data-driven solutions. Platforms like SpherexAI utilize artificial intelligence to analyze visual, audio, and textual elements, providing insights into how well content aligns with cultural and regulatory standards across over 200 countries and territories. This approach helps media companies understand the "cultural distance" between a title's origin and its target market, enabling them to make informed decisions about global distribution.

By leveraging these advanced tools, M&E companies can go beyond traditional content localization. They can create media that actively engages and resonates with diverse audiences. As the industry continues to evolve, those companies that embrace culturally informed, data-driven approaches will be better positioned to succeed, fostering cross-cultural understanding and trust while delivering globally appealing content.

Download the report here.

Read Now