← Back To All Posts
Date:
October 11, 2022

The Cultural Landscape of Horror Films

How horror films navigate global content restrictions

"Great green globs of greasy, grimy gopher guts,
Mutilated monkey meat.
Dirty little birdie feet.
Great green globs of greasy, grimy gopher guts,
That's what I like to eat."

Source: Mid-20th Century children's song, sung to the tune of "The Old Gray Mare"

Did you know that Halloween, and similar celebrations, are found in many countries worldwide?

In the US, Canada, and Ireland, Halloween is celebrated on October 31 with trick or treating, costume parties, and games. Its origins date back to the ancient Celts, when people believed it was the day that the ghosts of the dead returned to earth. As we do today, they wore costumes to help ward off any evil spirits they encountered. Día de Los Muertos (Day of the Dead) is a Latin American and Spanish three-day celebration from October 31 to November 2. It pays tribute to the dead who, it is believed, return to their homes on Earth each Halloween for a reunion with their living relatives. In England, Guy Fawkes Day is celebrated on November 5 with fireworks and bonfires to commemorate the execution of the famous English traitor. While these celebrations may not share the same origin story, they have one thing in common: dead people.

Comedies, dramas, horror, and thriller titles using these celebrations or themes have been mainstays of the Fall release schedule for generations. The first of the famous "Halloween" horror franchise starring Jamie Lee Curtis was released in 1978. To date, the franchise has grossed more than $750M worldwide . Disney's 2017 animated release " Coco " celebrated Día de Los Muertos, featured the first all-Hispanic cast, and grossed over $807M worldwide . While there haven't been many films about Guy Fawkes, a mask that resembles him was a key feature in the 2005 film " V for Vendetta " and has become a popular Halloween costume in the US and UK.

These are the more mainstream titles in the "Horror and Suspense" genre. There is a significant difference between those and the gorier and more disturbing films entering the marketplace. How do they fare in today's increased regulatory and cultural scrutiny climate? Let's look at a few recent titles and examine the differences in their ratings.

Global ratings aren't universal

" NOPE " is the third horror genre film from director Jordan Peele. Released in 2022, it is the story of the owners of a financially troubled horse-handling business and their encounters with an extra-terrestrial at a rural California ranch. The film includes scenes with strong language and depicts violent death, blood splatter, child abduction, and agonized screams as the alien devours its victims. "NOPE" earned an " R " rating in the US for "language throughout and some violence/bloody images." Except for Singapore (NC16) and Malaysia (18), every other country that rated "NOPE" rated it lower: Italy gave it a "6+", it got a "G" in Japan, and a "12" rating in Columbia, Egypt, Germany, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, and Taiwan. To date, the film has grossed $171M worldwide.

The AMC television series " The Walking Dead " includes content regulators find objectionable and affect its ratings. The series follows a Kentucky county sheriff who awakens from a coma to discover the world in the grip of a zombie apocalypse. Sex and nudity, violence and gore, alcohol and drug use, and frightening scenes are commonplace throughout the episodes. Typical scenes include bloody body parts, cannibalism, gun violence, and graphic zombie deaths. The series has earned a TV-MA rating in the US (inappropriate for ages under 17) and has similar or higher ratings in most countries where it is available. There are a few exceptions. It earned a "13+" rating in Quebec, Canada, a "VM14" in Italy, and a "15" in Sweden.

The cultural differences between horror and gore ratings

So why the differences? The answer comes down to culture. Culture is reflected in the age rating, which is also impacted by how the title is distributed. It is not uncommon for a title to have different theatrical, TV, streaming, and DVD ratings. Horror films are good examples of this phenomenon because they are often edited differently to comply with specific country guidelines for each distribution platform. If you want to learn more about those differences, please see our previous blog posts on the topic, which you can find here and here .

Platform aside, the critical factors in assessing horror titles to determine an appropriate age rating include:

  • Does the horror have any violence, e.g., blood, bodies, mutilations, etc.?
  • Would the horror frighten children? If it would, then does it mitigate that impact, such as a positive ending, uplifting music, or humor?
  • How does it end? Is everyone saved, or does everyone die?
  • Is the horror realistic? Is this more like a psychological thriller, gory like "The Grudge," or offers no socially redeeming value like "Human Centipede?"
  • What's the pacing? Is it fast-paced with lots of jump scares, or is it slower-paced, relying on the cinematography and effects to create the tension?
  • Is the cause supernatural or extra-terrestrial? Though countries have become less sensitive to the supernatural, there remain a few where supernatural themes get higher ratings, especially countries like China, Vietnam, and Indonesia.
  • Is the fear constant, or are there breaks for other emotions?

How these factors function varies widely by country, and the ratings reflect the differences. Brazil, for example, will not rate any title containing "scary" content as acceptable for audiences younger than ten years old. The Netherlands provides lower ratings for titles if the terrified victim is saved from the source of the terror. Slovakia and other Eastern European countries have rules that raise the ratings if scenes include physical transformations from human to something else (like a werewolf) or serial killers as characters. Germany focuses on the cinematography to determine how graphic it is, e.g., out-of-focus, in the shadows, or in your face. Denmark will change ratings based on whether the scene is a "good thrill" or horrific. As horror films have become more graphic, regulators tend not to assign a rating lower than 16+, effectively limiting their reach to young adults and older audiences.

Horror films may not be everyone's cup of tea, but they are a significant entertainment genre that generates considerable revenue for creators, distributors, and platforms. How age ratings are assessed is a good primer for understanding how the rating process works and how cultural interpretations of events and scenes matter.

Decisions on appropriately preparing a title for wide release are best left in the hands of the people who created it. Using Spherex technologies, creators and distributors can identify content that will impact an age rating as early as the final script draft through a finished cut. Using our cultural playbook, creators can identify objectionable content within a title and determine the extent to which compliance edits are necessary for it to reach its optimal audience. Contact Spherex today to learn how we can help you maximize your title's audience and revenue.

Related Insights

The Global Rules of Content Are Changing

Across the past eight issues of Spherex’s weekly World M&E News newsletter, one theme has become undeniable: regulation, censorship, and compliance are rewriting the rules of global media. From AI policy to platform accountability, from creative freedom to cultural oversight, content creation is now inseparable from compliance.

1. Platforms Tighten Control Through Age and Safety Laws

U.S. states such as Wyoming and South Dakota have enacted age-verification laws that mirror strict internet safety rules already seen in the U.K., signaling a broader legislative trend toward restricting access to mature material.

At the same time, Saudi Arabia’s audiovisual regulator ordered Roblox to suspend chat functions and hire Arabic moderators to protect minors—an example of government-imposed moderation replacing voluntary compliance.

Elsewhere, Instagram’s PG-13 policy update illustrates how platforms are preemptively adapting before new government rules arrive.

2. Censorship Expands — Even as Its Methods Evolve

Censorship remains pervasive but increasingly localized. India’s Central Board of Film Certification demanded one minute, 55 seconds of cuts from They Call Him OG, removing what they considered violent imagery and nudity.

In China, the horror film Together was digitally altered so that a gay couple became straight using AI. Responding to Malaysia’s stricter limits on sexual or suggestive content, censors excised a “swimming pool” scene from Chainsaw Man – The Movie.

Israel’s culture minister threatened to pull funding from the Ophir national film awards after a Palestinian-themed film about a 12-year-old boy won best picture.

3. AI and Content Creation: Between Innovation and Oversight

AI remains both catalyst and controversy. Netflix announced new internal policies limiting how AI can be used in production to protect creative rights and data ownership.

OpenAI’s decision to allow adult content on ChatGPT under “freedom of expression” principles sparked industry debate about whether platforms or creators set the moral boundaries of AI. OpenAI’s CEO Sam Altman emphasized in a statement, the company is “not the moral police.”

Meanwhile, California passed the Digital Likeness Protection Act to combat unauthorized use of celebrity images in AI-generated ads.

4. Governments Target Global Platforms

The Indonesian government is advancing a sweeping plan to filter content on Netflix, YouTube, Disney+ Hotstar, and others using audience-specific content suitability metrics.

At the same time, the U.K. and EU are reexamining long-standing broadcast rules, with Sweden’s telecom authority proposing the deregulation of domestic broadcasting to encourage competition.

These diverging approaches—tightening in one market, loosening in another—underscore the growing fragmentation of global compliance standards.

5. Compliance as Competitive Advantage

The real shift is strategic: companies now see compliance as value creation, not red tape. As Spherex has argued in recent Substack articles, The Hidden Costs of Non-Compliance in Video Content Production and Why Content Differentiation Matters More Than Ever, studios and creators who anticipate regulatory complexity and make necessary edits on their terms while remaining true to their stories can reach more markets and larger audiences with fewer risks.

In other words, understanding compliance early has become the difference between limited release and global scale.

Conclusion

From new age-verification laws to AI disclosure acts and streaming filters, regulation now defines the boundaries of creativity. The next evolution of media will belong to those who can move fastest within those boundaries—leveraging compliance not as constraint but as clarity.

Read Now

Spherex Wins MarTech Breakthrough Award for Best AI-Powered Ad Targeting Solution

The annual MarTech Breakthrough Awards are conducted by MarTech Breakthrough, a leading market intelligence organization that recognizes the world’s most innovative marketing, sales, and advertising technology companies. 

This year’s program attracted over 4,000 nominations from across the globe, with winners representing the most innovative solutions in the industry. This year’s roster includes Adobe, HubSpot, Sprout Social, Cision, ZoomInfo, Optimizely, Sitecore, and other top technology leaders, alongside in-house martech innovations from companies such as Verizon and Capital One.

At the heart of this win is SpherexAI, our multimodal platform that powers contextual ad targeting at the scene level. By analyzing video content across visual, audio, dialogue, and emotional signals, SpherexAI enables advertisers to deliver messages at the most impactful moments. Combined with our Cultural Knowledge Graph, the platform ensures campaigns resonate authentically across more than 200 countries and territories while maintaining cultural sensitivity and brand safety.

“Spherex is leveraging its expertise in video compliance to help advertisers navigate the complexities of brand safety and monetization,” Teresa Phillips, CEO of Spherex, said in a statement. “SpherexAI is the only solution that blends scene-level intelligence with deep cultural and emotional insights, giving advertisers a powerful tool to ensure strategic ad placement and engagement.”

This recognition underscores Spherex’s commitment to building the next generation of AI solutions where cultural intelligence, relevance, and brand safety define success. The award also highlights the growing importance of cultural intelligence in global advertising. As audiences consume more content across borders and devices, brands need solutions that go beyond surface-level targeting to connect meaningfully with viewers. SpherexAI provides that bridge, empowering advertisers to scale campaigns that are not only effective but also contextually relevant and culturally respectful.

Read Now

YouTube Thumbnails Can Get You in Trouble

Here’s Why Creators Should Pay Attention

When we talk about content compliance on YouTube, most people think of the video content itself — what’s said, what’s shown, and how it’s edited. But there’s another part of the video that carries serious consequences if it violates YouTube policy: the thumbnail.

Thumbnails aren’t just visual hooks — they’re promos and they’re subject to the same content policies as videos. According to YouTube’s official guidelines, thumbnails that contain nudity, sexual content, violent imagery, misleading visuals, or vulgar language can be removed, age-restricted, or lead to a strike on your channel. Repeat offenses can even result in demonetization or channel termination. That’s a steep price to pay for what some may think of as a simple promotional image.

The Hidden Risk in a Single Frame

The challenge? The thumbnail is often selected from the video itself — either manually or auto-generated from a frame. Creators under tight deadlines or managing high-volume channels may not take the time to double-check every frame. They may let the platform choose it automatically. This is where things get risky.

A few seconds of unblurred nudity, a fleeting violent scene, or a misleading expression of shock might seem harmless in motion. But when captured as a still image, those same moments can trigger YouTube’s moderation systems — or worse, violate the platform’s Community Guidelines.

Let’s say your video includes a horror scene with simulated gore. It might pass YouTube’s rules with an age restriction. But if the thumbnail zooms in on a blood-splattered face, that thumbnail could be removed, and your channel could be penalized. Even thumbnails that are simply “too suggestive” or “misleading” can get flagged.

Misleading Thumbnails: Not Just Clickbait — a Violation

Another common mistake is using a thumbnail that implies something the video doesn’t deliver — for example, suggesting nudity, shocking violence, or sexually explicit content that never appears in the video. These aren’t just bad for audience trust; they’re a clear violation of YouTube’s thumbnail policy.

Even if your content is compliant, the wrong thumbnail can cause very real problems.

The Reality for Content Creators

It’s essential to recognize that YouTube’s thumbnail policy doesn’t exist in isolation. It intersects with other rules around child safety, nudity, vulgar language, violence, and more. A thumbnail with vulgar text, even if the video is educational or satirical, may still result in age restrictions or removal. A still frame with a suggestive pose, even if brief and unintended in the video itself, can be enough to get flagged.

And for creators monetizing their work, especially across multiple markets, the risk goes beyond visibility. A flagged thumbnail can reduce ad eligibility, limit reach, or cut off monetization entirely. Worse, a pattern of violations can threaten a channel’s long-term viability.

What’s a Creator to Do?

First, you need to know how to spot the problem and then know what to do about it. Second, you need to know if the changes you make might affect its acceptance in other markets or countries. Only then can you manually scrub through your video looking for risky frames. You can review policies and try to stay up to date on the nuances of what YouTube considers “gratifying” versus “educational” or “documentary.” But doing this at scale — especially for a growing content library — is overwhelming.  

That’s where a tool like SpherexAI can help.

A Smarter Way to Stay Compliant

SpherexAI uses frame-level and scene-level analysis to flag potential compliance issues — not just in your video, but in any frame that could be selected as a thumbnail. Using its patented knowledge graph, which includes every published regulatory and platform rule, it will prepare detailed and accurate edit decision lists that tell you not only what the problem is, but also for each of your target audiences. Whether you're publishing to a single audience or distributing globally, SpherexAI checks your content against YouTube’s policies and localized cultural standards.

For creators trying to grow their brand, monetize their work, and stay in good standing with platforms, that kind of precision can mean the difference between success and a takedown notice.

Want to know if your content is at risk? Learn how SpherexAI can help you protect your channel and optimize every frame — including the thumbnail. Contact us to learn more.

Read Now