The Plus and Minus of Platform Naming Conventions

At what point is imitation no longer the sincerest form of flattery?

A trend in platform naming involves appending "Plus" or "+" to the brand name. Amazon announced last week, for example, that it was rebranding its recently acquired "Epix" streaming channel as "MGM+." This is consistent with a trend that began a few years ago as major brands have adopted the "Plus" naming strategy.

Here are a few examples:

CBS All Access rebranded to Paramount+
BET rebranded to BET+
Disney Channel rebranded to Disney+
Discovery Channel rebranded to Discovery+
AMC Channel rebranded to AMC+
Samsung TV rebranded to Samsung TV+
StarzPlay rebranded to Lionsgate+
Apple TV rebranded to Apple TV+

Over a dozen companies have opted to add "Plus" to their name, and Amazon's recent decision indicates that there is no sign the trend will end anytime soon.

The Pluses of "Plus"

There is a method to the madness. Amazon's reason for rebranding Epix is to take advantage of MGM's brand equity, highlight MGM's extensive film library, and utilize MGM's IP for future television and movie productions.

Paramount (then known as ViacomCBS) president Bob Bakish described their decision to add the "+" because "Paramount is an iconic and storied brand beloved by consumers all over the world, and it is synonymous with quality, integrity, and world-class storytelling."

Disney's decision to add the "+" was to align with the branding format it had adopted with the launch of ESPN+ in 2018. Then CEO Bob Iger indicated Disney had made a significant financial investment in ESPN's rebranding and its success, in their view, "bodes very well" for the success of the Disney+ brand.

Top branding experts agree with the "Plus" strategy, citing consumer familiarity with the concept and that it simplifies brand offerings. For example, it means consumers can access both the brand's movies and tv shows. It could mean no ads to watch, the bundling of additional channels to reduce subscription costs, and more genres of content, all of which increase consumers' interest in the channel's content and reduces churn. It's clear why parent companies find value in this branding identity, but it begs the question of when is enough enough?

The Minuses

There's the old saying, "Familiarity breeds contempt," and this naming convention has undoubtedly shown some truth to it. Fortune , Fast Company , and the New York Times have written about the trend, and their primary criticism is that while it may make sense in the near term, that benefit is lost long term. They argue that when too many brand names sound the same, any differentiation between them becomes meaningless. Bucking the trend seems prescient, and Peacock gets credit for not going along.

The creators of "South Park: Post COVID: The Return of COVID" cleverly highlighted this loss of consumer differentiation . In the first three minutes of the episode, viewers see signs for "South Park Elementary Plus," "Pizza Plus," "Muffler Shop Max," "Boots & Biscuits Max," "Tom's Rhinoplasty Plus," "Post Office Max," and others. Throughout the rest of the episode, hotels, restaurants, schools, mental asylums, wine bars, and even cemeteries all had "Plus" or "Max" appended to their names. Film star and entrepreneur Ryan Reynolds made fun of the trend by adding a fictional streaming service to his wireless Mint Mobile service, calling it Mint Mobile Plus , going so far as to copy the Disney+ look.

Brand identification and protection are crucial in the rapidly expanding streaming market space. So much attention is focused on content quality, preparation for global markets, and how it contributes to brand reputation that it is easy to overlook other factors that impact how consumers see a brand.

In the grand scheme, platform names may not matter much to the average subscriber. They're more concerned about finding something to watch than the name. Don't most people refer to Disney+ as "Disney" and Paramount+ as "Paramount?" If we had to guess, probably most of them. But companies spend big bucks on branding, hoping their names stick in consumers' minds. Much time is spent making sure content titles don't sound the same; interestingly, platform names haven't received the same attention.

Related Insights

Spherex Classification Tool Now Approved for Home Entertainment Content in Australia

Spherex

Regulation

Classification

The Albanese Government has updated the Spherex Classification Tool approval to include ratings for theatrical releases, home entertainment, and streaming content in Australia. Spherex was previously approved to classify online films.

The update underscores the Australian Classification Board’s confidence in Spherex as a tool to help Australian viewers make informed choices about the content they consume. This means Australians can now access a range of new films sooner than they might across all formats and windows.

Spherex has a longstanding relationship with the Australian Classification Board. Since 2020, Spherex has collaborated closely with the Australian Government to ensure its technology reliably generates classification decisions that meet Australian standards and viewers' expectations.

As the world’s only commercial provider of local age ratings, Spherex has successfully produced classification decisions for high volumes of online content in over 100 countries. Since 2018, Spherex has issued over one million age ratings for digital content, including films, TV shows, and trailers, distributed by its clients worldwide.

Spherex customers, including Umbrella Entertainment, Madman Entertainment, and Sugoi Co., rely on its AI-based platform to obtain local age ratings in Australia and significantly improve efficiency, cost reduction, and market reach.

Discover how Spherex's cutting-edge AI-based platform can streamline your content classification process and enhance your market reach while reducing costs.

Visit spherex.com today and see how we can support your content distribution needs.

Read Now

nScreenNoise - Interview Spherex: Avoiding the cultural dead zone

Spherex

Culture

One of the conundrums of streaming is that although a service can deliver content globally, it is not guaranteed to be acceptable in a particular local market. Netflix found this out when it announced global availability in 2016 at CES and was quickly banned in markets like Indonesia, where some of the content was deemed too violent or sexual. In 2016, without boots on the ground in a local market, it wasn’t easy to assess whether a show or movie would be culturally acceptable.

Today, global media companies are acutely aware of the importance of their content’s cultural fit. Moreover, they have a company like Spherex to help them prepare their content to ensure it fits with any country of interest. I interviewed Teresa Phillips, the Co-Founder and CEO of Spherex, at the recent OTT.X Summit in Los Angeles. She explained how the company is leveraging AI and its massive cultural profiling database to help companies prepare content for target markets. She also explained how, in the near future, AI would aid the company in measuring a movie or show’s cultural distance from a regional market and help it avoid falling into the failure zone between cultural fit and novelty interest.

Listen to the full interview here.

Read Now

Spherex Featured in the DPP's IBC 2024: Demand versus Supply Report

Spherex

Industry

Spherex was featured in the DPP’s IBC 2024: Demand versus Supply Report, a comprehensive look at how the M&E industry is meeting key customer demands. The report focuses on the topics of empowering creators, understanding audiences, engaging users, and innovating the newsroom. It also highlights many of the technical innovations seen at the recent IBC Show.

An article by Spherex’s CEO Teresa Phillips titled "Navigating Cultural Resonance in Global Media: The Art and Science of Culture Mixing" was featured in the report, exploring how Spherex is pioneering the future of culturally informed content.

Teresa shares how cultural mixing has become a critical strategy for creating content that appeals to diverse audiences in today's global media landscape. This phenomenon involves blending elements from different cultures to craft films and television shows that resonate globally while adhering to local regulations.

However, the process of culture mixing is fraught with risks. Superficial or stereotypical representations can lead to accusations of cultural appropriation or insensitivity, alienating audiences and damaging a company's reputation. For example, imposing Western concepts on Eastern content without proper context can feel inauthentic and jarring to local viewers. These missteps highlight the need for a nuanced understanding of cultural elements to ensure that content is respectful and engaging.

To address these challenges, M&E companies are increasingly turning to data-driven solutions. Platforms like SpherexAI utilize artificial intelligence to analyze visual, audio, and textual elements, providing insights into how well content aligns with cultural and regulatory standards across over 200 countries and territories. This approach helps media companies understand the "cultural distance" between a title's origin and its target market, enabling them to make informed decisions about global distribution.

By leveraging these advanced tools, M&E companies can go beyond traditional content localization. They can create media that actively engages and resonates with diverse audiences. As the industry continues to evolve, those companies that embrace culturally informed, data-driven approaches will be better positioned to succeed, fostering cross-cultural understanding and trust while delivering globally appealing content.

Download the report here.

Read Now